Review Field and Plant Performance on More Than the Number
In consumer goods, sales arrive weekly and the number is always on the screen, so reviews tend to be conversations about the target. Territories differ in potential, the quality of work at the outlet goes unseen, and plant and depot staff are measured somewhere else altogether. We help you set up goals, reviews and ratings that account for those differences, so a rating can be explained to the person who receives it.
Not sure what you need? Tell us about your business in six short steps and we will come to the first meeting prepared.
Share your requirementsThe starting point
Does the Review Begin and End with Achievement Against Target?
When the number is available every week, it becomes the only thing anyone discusses. A salesperson in a strong territory looks good, one building a weak territory looks poor, and nobody has seen how either worked the beat.
We help you define what each role is judged on, then give managers a way to see it.
You may be experiencing:
- Targets cascaded to territories without regard to the outlets, potential or the stage of distribution.
- Execution at the outlet, such as range presence, display and call quality, seen only when a manager rides along, which is rare.
- Area managers who rate their team in different ways, so ratings in two regions are not comparable.
- Plant and depot staff reviewed on a different cycle and form from sales, with no common language of performance.
- Merchandisers and promoters judged by an agency report that the company does not check.
- Reviews held after the incentive is paid, so the conversation is about the past and nothing is planned.
- Strong sellers rated highly and promoted into management without anyone checking whether they coach.
What we can help with
Our Performance Management Services for FMCG and Consumer Goods
KRAs and KPIs by Role
A short list of results and measures for each role: sales officer, van salesman, merchandiser, area manager, line operator, dispatch supervisor and others, so that each person knows what they are judged on.
Territory-Adjusted Targets
A method for reading achievement against the potential and development stage of a territory, so that a person building a weak beat is not compared directly with one inheriting a strong one.
Execution and Coverage Measures
Measures of what happens at the outlet, including call frequency, productive calls, range presence and display compliance, drawn from the sales app or from supervisor visits.
Ride-Along and Joint Visit Structure
A format and rhythm for area managers to work with each salesperson in the field, with a short checklist and a note that feeds the review.
Review Cadence
A calendar of monthly check-ins, quarterly reviews and an annual review, aligned to the incentive cycle so that conversations about development happen before the payout, not only after.
Plant and Depot Performance Reviews
Review formats for production, quality, maintenance and dispatch roles, covering output, quality, safety conduct and skill, kept in the same structure as the field reviews.
Ratings and Calibration
A rating scale with definitions, and calibration sessions in which regional heads compare ratings across areas, so the scale means the same thing in each.
Improvement Plans and Recommendations
A format for a time-bound improvement plan with support from the manager, and the route by which review results feed into promotion, training and pay decisions.
The deliverables
What You Receive
Depending on the agreed scope, the work produces:
- KRA and KPI sheets for the main field, depot, plant and head office roles.
- A method for adjusting target reading by territory potential and stage.
- An execution scorecard for field roles, with its data sources.
- A ride-along format and a visit rhythm for area managers.
- A review calendar linked to the incentive cycle.
- Review forms for sales, merchandising, plant and depot roles.
- A rating scale, calibration guide and meeting format.
- An improvement plan template and a note on how outcomes feed other decisions.
Step by step
How We Work
Study how reviews run now
We read recent review forms and ratings, and speak with area managers, plant supervisors and a sample of reviewees, to see what is measured and what is missing.
Define success by role
With your managers we agree the few results and behaviours that matter for each role, and where the evidence for each will come from.
Design the measures and the reading of targets
We draft KPIs, the territory adjustment and the execution scorecard, and test them on a past period's data.
Build the cadence and forms
We set the calendar, the forms and the calibration meeting, and brief the reviewers.
Run a first cycle with the managers
We support the first review round. Before work starts we record where you stand, and we report against it.
The difference
Ratings That Can Be Explained
A clear performance system helps you:
We do not promise outcomes. We record a baseline before work starts, covering the share of reviews completed on time, the spread of ratings by region and the number of joint visits made, and report against it, so you can see what changed and what did not.
- Tell each person what the role is judged on, in a few lines.
- Read achievement with territory potential in view.
- See the quality of work at the outlet, beyond the sales figure.
- Compare ratings across regions on a common scale.
- Hold development conversations before the incentive is decided.
- Give plant, depot and field a shared review language.
Find your fit
Who This Service Is For
Sales Heads and Regional Managers
Leaders who want to see execution behind the numbers and compare areas fairly.
Plant and Depot Heads
Managers whose reviews are on a separate cycle and want the same discipline as sales.
HR Teams Introducing a Formal Review
Teams in growing companies where reviews have been informal or occasional.
Companies with Promotion Disputes
Owners who need ratings that justify who is promoted.
How it usually shows up in fmcg and consumer goods
Performance in FMCG is tracked closely at the field end, through sales, coverage, productive calls, distribution of the product range and display compliance at the outlet. Reviews tend to focus on the number against the target, since it is available weekly. Territories are not equal in potential, so a salesperson in a strong territory meets target more easily than one in a developing one. Beat discipline and execution quality at the outlet are visible only to a supervisor who rides with the salesperson, which happens rarely. Plant and depot staff are measured on output, quality and safety, in different systems from sales.
Common challenges
Where it goes wrong in fmcg and consumer goods
Territories are not equal
The same target is harder in a weak territory, and the review does not allow for it.
Execution is unseen
Quality of display and beat discipline are known only to those who ride along.
The review follows the number
The rating tracks target achievement, whatever the potential of the territory.
Plant and depot are reviewed apart
Their measures and cycles differ, and the company has no common standard.
A better process
What a working version looks like
- 01
Adjust for potential
Compare achievement with the territory's potential, not only the flat target. The performance management process holds the form.
- 02
Measure execution
Coverage, productive calls, range distribution and display compliance, checked on rides and by audit.
- 03
Ride with the salesperson regularly
A supervisor visit each month, with a short written note.
- 04
Align the cycle across workforces
One review calendar, with measures suited to each workforce.
What to check this week
- Compare two territories of different potential and see how their salespeople were rated.
- Ask a salesperson how his execution at the outlet is checked.
- Find out how often a supervisor rides with a salesperson.
- Look at whether plant and depot reviews share the cycle.
- Ask what measures appear on a field review beyond sales.
Confirm with a qualified professional. What applies depends on your establishment, your state and your sector, and it changes. This page describes a practice; it does not state a legal position.
What this looks like in fmcg and consumer goods
The parts of performance management that are specific to this sector, rather than general.
Performance Measures
Field, depot and plant on their own terms.
What this coversHide
Performance Measures
Field, depot and plant on their own terms.
What this coversHideField
- Secondary sales
- Outlet coverage
- Coverage plan adherence
- New outlet addition
- Productivity per call
- Collection
- Reporting discipline
Plant and depot
- Output against plan
- Quality rejections
- Dispatch accuracy
- Loading turnaround
- Stock accuracy
- Safety observance
- Attendance
Questions on this, in fmcg and consumer goods
We help you define a way to read achievement against the outlets, potential and stage of development of each territory, set out in writing beforehand. You decide how much weight it carries in ratings and in incentive.
We can design measures from data you already hold, such as productive calls and range presence in the sales app, and from supervisor visits. We describe what each measure shows and its limits so that it is not over-read.
The incentive is paid on the scheme. The review looks at how the work was done and what comes next. We keep them linked in time and separate in purpose, and you decide how far they connect.
We can design a review format that you apply to agency merchandisers placed with you, with a route for feedback to the agency. The agency remains their employer, and your contract with it sets what you can ask.
No. Your managers rate their people. We design the framework, train the reviewers and facilitate calibration so that the ratings are consistent and the reasons can be stated.
Against the potential of each territory as well as the flat target, so effort and skill are separated from luck of the draw.
Coverage, productive calls, range distribution and display compliance. They show execution quality, which leads sales.
At least monthly, with a short note afterwards. It is the main way execution is seen.
The cycle and calendar can be common, with measures suited to each. A common timetable makes the whole company's reviews easier to manage.
A short note on beat discipline, outlet conversations, execution and one thing to improve, shared with the salesperson. The note is what makes the ride-along a review and not a visit.
Judge the Work as Well as the Number
Tell us how people are reviewed in your field force, depots and plants. We will discuss a framework that reads performance fairly across territories.
Prefer to talk first? Call +91 80958 58589 or write to hello@gullyhr.com.
Discuss Your Review Process
Share how reviews run now and what you want to change.
The general method — what performance management covers, the questions it answers and what an engagement produces — is the same whatever the sector, and is set out on the performance management process page. What is above is the part that differs for fmcg and consumer goods.
To run this in a system rather than on paper, see performance management software.
Other HR topics for fmcg and consumer goods
Where to start
Most engagements begin with a review of how this runs in your business today, then a written process and the sequence to implement it.
See all HR topics for fmcg and consumer goods, or another industry.