Performance management process for Industry associations: appraisal for a small secretariat with many bosses
In a small secretariat, good work and poor work are both easy to see and hard to measure. A short, honest appraisal lets the director reward the coordinator who delivers and help the one who struggles.

Not sure what you need? Tell us about your business in six short steps and we will come to the first meeting prepared.
Share your requirementsWhy performance management process matters in industry associations
Association staff are judged informally by whoever shouted last. A chair praises the seminar that went well; another complains about a delayed circular. The director collects these remarks in memory and the annual increment is a compromise. Coordinators cannot tell what is expected of them, and the better ones notice that effort and result are not linked.
A light process works better. Four or five outcomes for each role, such as events delivered, member queries answered in time or papers published, reviewed in a half-yearly talk. Feedback from committee chairs is gathered once, in a fixed form, instead of arriving as complaints. The talk ends with one or two actions and a date. The process should be easy enough that the director actually does it.
How to set it up
1. Set four or five outcomes per role
Write them with each coordinator in plain words, tied to the events and services they own. Avoid long lists, and avoid measures that depend on a chair being pleased.
2. Collect chair feedback once
Before each review, ask the committee chairs a few fixed questions about the coordinator they work with. Summarise the replies without names.
3. Hold a half-yearly conversation
The director and the coordinator meet for an hour, go through the outcomes and note what went well and what did not. Both sign a one-page note.
4. Link the result to growth and increments
Use the notes when deciding on increments, new responsibilities and training. Explain the reason to the person whatever the outcome.
5. Deal with the director separately
Agree with the president how the director is reviewed, against outcomes the executive group has approved. Do it at the same time each year.
Check these first
Before changing anything, find out what is true today. These take an afternoon and use your own records.
- Ask three coordinators to say what their top outcomes are and see whether their answers match their director.
- Check whether the last increment was explained to each person with reasons.
- Look for any complaint from a chair that reached a coordinator without the director seeing it first.
- Check that the director has written outcomes and a named reviewer.
GullyHR can do this with you. Read how we approach performance management process in general, or share your requirements and we will tell you where to start.
Questions owners ask
Judge what the person controls: planning, preparation, follow up and member feedback. Note the result of the whole event separately, and avoid blaming one person for what the whole team shaped.
Not for a small team. A short written summary with a plain label such as meets, exceeds or needs support is usually enough. The conversation matters more than the number.
Collect chair feedback through a fixed form and let the director own the final view. If a chair insists on a say, route it through the executive group so that it is open.